We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Stand Your Ground Law Debate “Cons” Essay

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website!

I. Introduction
a. Describe The Federalist Papers are and when they started b. Thesis: The Federalist influenced the ratification of the Constitution by making some of their most important arguments, including the importance of being in a Union by having a Constitution, answering to the objections made by the Anti-federalists about separation of powers, and defending opposing arguments made against the characteristics of the executive and judicial branch as provided in the Constitution. II. Background

a. State when The Federalist was printed and published. b. Discuss the intentions and purposes of The Federalist. III. Argument for the benefit of a Union a. A Union would guard against external dangers b. A Union would guard against internal dangers

Read more: How did big states vs small states guard against tyranny essay

A. The “extended sphere” argument about how it will control factions. (Federalist 10) IV. Argument of the problem with complete separation of powers a. Anti-federalists wanted a complete separation of the judicial, executive, and legislative branches b. The Federalist said the maxim of complete separation of powers is misunderstood. (Montesquieu) c. The branches need some limited power of the other branches to protect themselves from encroachment of the other branches (Federalist 51) A. The branches need to have the interests of maintaining their powers, and not letting the other branches take that away. V. Argument for a single executive, and against a plural executive a. Anti-federalists didn’t want a single executive, too much like a monarch b.

We will write a custom essay sample on Stand Your Ground Law Debate “Cons” specifically for you

Order now

The Federalist need the executive to be “energetic” and a plural executive would make this impossible (Federalist 70) A. It would take too long for the people in the executive position to make decision in an emergency, because they might disagree. B. In a plural executive, it is hard to tell who is responsible for a wrongdoing because they can all blame each other, so a single executive would lead to more responsible behavior VI. Argument in favor of judicial review and terms of good behavior for judges a. Anti-federalists didn’t like judicial review and the term of good behavior b. The Federalist argued that judicial review was necessary to protect the judicial branch from the Legislature. c. A term of good behavior was necessary to get qualified people for the positions; it would also give them time to develop knowledge. VII. Conclusion

a. Thesis
b. The dates of the ratification of the Constitution by the States c. The Federalist’s influence beyond the ratification

How to cite this page

Choose cite format:

Stand Your Ground Law Debate “Cons”. (2016, Mar 22). Retrieved from http://galerieartmoderne.com/stand-your-ground-law-debate-cons-essay

We will write a custom essay sample onStand Your Ground Law Debate “Cons”specifically for you

Our customer support team is available Monday-Friday 9am-5pm EST. If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.

By clicking "Send Message", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
No results found for “ image
Try Our service
online

Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out http://goo.gl/CYf83b

online

Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out http://goo.gl/CYf83b

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!

Sitemap